![]() We could all become Mozarts or Einsteins if we persevered. These patterns can be observed as the individual encounters and ultimately masters an organized activity or domain in his/her culture. ![]() I believe that human talents are based on distinct patterns of brain connectivity. If the belief that consciousness is a mystery is a source of human hope, there may be a real danger that exposing the trick could send us all to hell. (Consider: we could never explain why 2 + 2 = 5, but we might relatively easily be able to explain why someone should be under the illusion that 2 + 2 = 5).ĭo I want to prove it? That's a difficult one. While it may seem-and even be-impossible for us to explain how a brain process could have the quality of consciousness, it may not be at all impossible to explain how a brain process could (be designed to) give rise to the impression of having this quality. The Catch-22 is that, just to the extent that Nature has succeeded in putting consciousness beyond the reach of rational explanation, she must have undermined the very possibility of showing that this is what she's done.īut nothing's perfect. Indeed "mysterian" philosophers-from Colin McGinn to the Pope-who bow down before the apparent miracle and declare that it's impossible in principle to understand how consciousness could arise in a material brain, are responding exactly as Nature hoped they would, with shock and awe.Ĭan I prove it? It's difficult to prove any adaptationist account of why humans experience things the way they do. If this is right, it provides a simple explanation for why we, as scientists or laymen, find the "hard problem" of consciousness just so hard. Who is the conjuror and why is s/he doing it? The conjuror is natural selection, and the purpose has been to bolster human self-confidence and self-importance-so as to increase the value we each place on our own and others' lives. I believe that human consciousness is a conjuring trick, designed to fool us into thinking we are in the presence of an inexplicable mystery. I'll go one step further: I bet that when we discover life on other planets, that although the materials may be different for running the computation, that they will create open ended systems of expression by means of the same trick, thereby giving birth to the process of universal computation. And we take meaningless actions and combine them into action sequences, sequences into events, and events into homicide and heroic rescues. We take meaningless strokes of paint and combine them into shapes, shapes into flowers, and flowers into Matisse's water lilies. Thus, we take meaningless phonemes and combine them into words, words into phrases, and phrases into Shakespeare. The trick: the capacity to take as input any set of discrete entities and recombine them into an infinite variety of meaningful expressions. Here's my best guess: we alone evolved a simple computational trick with far reaching implications for every aspect of our life, from language and mathematics to art, music and morality. ![]() What do I believe is true but cannot prove? The answer is: You! And yet, I haven't the slightest doubt that everyone I know has an inner life, a subjective experience, a sense of self, that is very much like mine. Most cognitive scientists believe that consciousness is a phenomenon that emerges from the complex interaction of decidedly nonconscious parts (neurons), but even when we finally understand the nature of that complex interaction, we still won't be able to prove that it produces the phenomenon in question. We take each other's consciousness on faith because we must, but after two thousand years of worrying about this issue, no one has ever devised a definitive test of its existence. To know whether their behavior is more than a clever trick-more than the pecking of a pigeon that has been trained to type "I am, I am!" They will swear up and down that they are conscious and they will demand their civil rights. These systems will talk, walk, wink, lie, and appear distressed by close elections. In the not too distant future, we will be able to construct artificial systems that give every appearance of consciousness-systems that act like us in every way. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |